TY - JOUR
T1 - Terrestrial radiotherapy alters microhardness and surface micromorphology of dental restorative materials
T2 - an in vitro study
AU - Walia, Apoorva
AU - Mallya, Laxmish
AU - MS, Athiyamaan
AU - Lobo, Dilson
AU - Shenoy, Ramya
AU - Shenoy, Annapoorna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
2025 Walia, Mallya, MS, Lobo, Shenoy and Shenoy.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Therapeutic radiotherapy, commonly used in the treatment of head and neck cancers, may alter the mechanical and surface properties of restorative dental materials. Understanding these changes is essential for ensuring the long-term success of restorations in oncology patients. Methods: An in vitro study was conducted on 90 disc-shaped specimens (n = 30 each) of three restorative materials: 3M™ Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Charisma Topaz One, and Cention N. Samples were subjected to two radiation protocols: (i) 70 Gy in 35 fractions (2 Gy/day), and (ii) 45 Gy in 5 fractions (9 Gy/day). Vickers microhardness testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed 48 h post-irradiation. Results: Filtek™ Bulk Fill exhibited the highest pre-radiation hardness (83.1 ± 2.3 HV), followed by Charisma Topaz One (74.5 ± 2.8 HV) and Cention N (69.8 ± 2.1 HV). After exposure to 70 Gy, a statistically significant reduction in microhardness was observed across all materials (p < 0.05), with Bulk Fill remaining the least affected (74.3 ± 2.1 HV). SEM images confirmed surface degradation in all groups, with varying degrees of filler particle exposure. Conclusions: Ionizing radiation alters both microhardness and surface morphology of restorative materials, with bulk-fill composites demonstrating greater resilience. These findings warrant further investigation in vivo to understand long-term clinical implications.
AB - Background: Therapeutic radiotherapy, commonly used in the treatment of head and neck cancers, may alter the mechanical and surface properties of restorative dental materials. Understanding these changes is essential for ensuring the long-term success of restorations in oncology patients. Methods: An in vitro study was conducted on 90 disc-shaped specimens (n = 30 each) of three restorative materials: 3M™ Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Charisma Topaz One, and Cention N. Samples were subjected to two radiation protocols: (i) 70 Gy in 35 fractions (2 Gy/day), and (ii) 45 Gy in 5 fractions (9 Gy/day). Vickers microhardness testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed 48 h post-irradiation. Results: Filtek™ Bulk Fill exhibited the highest pre-radiation hardness (83.1 ± 2.3 HV), followed by Charisma Topaz One (74.5 ± 2.8 HV) and Cention N (69.8 ± 2.1 HV). After exposure to 70 Gy, a statistically significant reduction in microhardness was observed across all materials (p < 0.05), with Bulk Fill remaining the least affected (74.3 ± 2.1 HV). SEM images confirmed surface degradation in all groups, with varying degrees of filler particle exposure. Conclusions: Ionizing radiation alters both microhardness and surface morphology of restorative materials, with bulk-fill composites demonstrating greater resilience. These findings warrant further investigation in vivo to understand long-term clinical implications.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018772569
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018772569#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3389/froh.2025.1658558
DO - 10.3389/froh.2025.1658558
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105018772569
SN - 2673-4842
VL - 6
JO - Frontiers in Oral Health
JF - Frontiers in Oral Health
M1 - 1658558
ER -