TY - JOUR
T1 - The clinical pharmacist governed periodic monitoring of high alert medications in a tertiary care hospital
T2 - A drug utilization evaluation study
AU - Panakkal, Linu Mohan
AU - Sam, Beneta Sarah
AU - Thomas, Ardhra Rose
AU - Latheef KV, Fahad
AU - Saheed, Fahmi
AU - Salim Karattuthodi, Mohammed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Introduction: Patient medication compliance is an essential component that determines treatment outcome. Discrepancies in therapy would generate adverse effects that can have inter-personal variability. In a hospital setting, high alert medications are usually administered under physician's supervision and require special considerations. Hence, there is a need to evaluate the drug utilization of such medications in the tertiary care hospitals. Materials & Methods: A six month retro-prospective observational study composed of three phases; first phase was scheduled for planning and setting of high alert medications’ rational usage criteria, second phase included data collection according to generated requirements. In phase 3, analysis of data and feedback of results. Results: One hundred and fifty four patients’ medical information was retrieved and had total of 229 prescribed high alert medications. Anti-thrombotic and anticoagulants (n = 89, 57.80%; enoxaparin sodium, n = 64, 71.9%) were highly utilized, followed by insulin (n = 30, 19.50%). Eighty six percent (n = 133) was complying with countersign and independent double checks concerning high alert medication and 89% (n = 137) patients were appropriately monitored. The drug utilization evaluation identified (n = 24) 15.6% transcription and documentation errors and few adverse drug reactions (infusion related, n = 3, 1.9%; drug related, n = 1). The subjects between the age group of 71 to 80 years (P-value < 0.05) and those with administration error (P-value < 0.01) had to stay longer in the hospital (> 9 days). Discussions: The pharmacist mediated patient review had sorted out few medication errors and adverse drug reactions. However, rapid high alert medication feedback system generated by the clinical pharmacist served the physicians to better manage the patient before it is late and without causing any fatal events. Conclusion: Training the medical professionals on proper handling and administration of high alert medications can reduce potential patient harm.
AB - Introduction: Patient medication compliance is an essential component that determines treatment outcome. Discrepancies in therapy would generate adverse effects that can have inter-personal variability. In a hospital setting, high alert medications are usually administered under physician's supervision and require special considerations. Hence, there is a need to evaluate the drug utilization of such medications in the tertiary care hospitals. Materials & Methods: A six month retro-prospective observational study composed of three phases; first phase was scheduled for planning and setting of high alert medications’ rational usage criteria, second phase included data collection according to generated requirements. In phase 3, analysis of data and feedback of results. Results: One hundred and fifty four patients’ medical information was retrieved and had total of 229 prescribed high alert medications. Anti-thrombotic and anticoagulants (n = 89, 57.80%; enoxaparin sodium, n = 64, 71.9%) were highly utilized, followed by insulin (n = 30, 19.50%). Eighty six percent (n = 133) was complying with countersign and independent double checks concerning high alert medication and 89% (n = 137) patients were appropriately monitored. The drug utilization evaluation identified (n = 24) 15.6% transcription and documentation errors and few adverse drug reactions (infusion related, n = 3, 1.9%; drug related, n = 1). The subjects between the age group of 71 to 80 years (P-value < 0.05) and those with administration error (P-value < 0.01) had to stay longer in the hospital (> 9 days). Discussions: The pharmacist mediated patient review had sorted out few medication errors and adverse drug reactions. However, rapid high alert medication feedback system generated by the clinical pharmacist served the physicians to better manage the patient before it is late and without causing any fatal events. Conclusion: Training the medical professionals on proper handling and administration of high alert medications can reduce potential patient harm.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85132626051
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85132626051#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.phacli.2021.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.phacli.2021.10.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85132626051
SN - 2772-9540
VL - 57
SP - 145
EP - 155
JO - Pharmacien Clinicien
JF - Pharmacien Clinicien
IS - 2
ER -