TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength, stability, and stress distribution in orthodontic anchorage
T2 - A conical, self-drilling miniscrew implant system
AU - Singh, Shivani
AU - Mogra, Subraya
AU - Shetty, V. Surendra
AU - Shetty, Siddarth
AU - Philip, Pramod
PY - 2012/3/1
Y1 - 2012/3/1
N2 - Introduction: The aims of this study were to analyze the stress distribution and displacement patterns that develop in an orthodontic miniscrew implant and its surrounding osseous structures for 2 implant materials under horizontal and torsional loading, with no ossseointegration. Methods: A numeric approach was adopted. The finite element method was used to determine the stress and displacement of the various components at a given time after miniscrew implant application, when, due to viscoelastic relaxation effects, the only remaining stress field was from the application of the orthodontic load. Results: Stress distribution was not significantly different between the 2 types of implant material. Increased stress values were located at the necks of the implants and the surrounding cortical bone. Bending of the titanium miniscrew was observed in the neck region under horizontal traction. Conclusions: The differences between the values of stress and displacement we obtained for the 2 types of miniscrew were too small to be clinically significant. Optimization of the miniscrew implant composed of the titanium alloy might be achieved by increasing the bulk (quantity) of the material in the neck region. The miniscrew implant can be immediately loaded and used for group movement of teeth.
AB - Introduction: The aims of this study were to analyze the stress distribution and displacement patterns that develop in an orthodontic miniscrew implant and its surrounding osseous structures for 2 implant materials under horizontal and torsional loading, with no ossseointegration. Methods: A numeric approach was adopted. The finite element method was used to determine the stress and displacement of the various components at a given time after miniscrew implant application, when, due to viscoelastic relaxation effects, the only remaining stress field was from the application of the orthodontic load. Results: Stress distribution was not significantly different between the 2 types of implant material. Increased stress values were located at the necks of the implants and the surrounding cortical bone. Bending of the titanium miniscrew was observed in the neck region under horizontal traction. Conclusions: The differences between the values of stress and displacement we obtained for the 2 types of miniscrew were too small to be clinically significant. Optimization of the miniscrew implant composed of the titanium alloy might be achieved by increasing the bulk (quantity) of the material in the neck region. The miniscrew implant can be immediately loaded and used for group movement of teeth.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863231773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863231773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.022
DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 22381493
AN - SCOPUS:84863231773
SN - 0889-5406
VL - 141
SP - 327
EP - 336
JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
IS - 3
ER -