TY - JOUR
T1 - Underlying assumptions in team effectiveness research
T2 - An application of problematization methodology
AU - Prabhu K.P, Nandan
AU - Pai, Rashmi Y.
AU - Abhishek, Abhishek S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - This paper examines current assumptions underlying the team effectiveness literature so as to propose alternative assumptions. Problematization methodology was used to problematize the existing assumptions. Integral Framework was applied to categorize constructs of team effectiveness literature. Alternative assumptions were proposed along with a discussion on their theory generation potential and the potential audience to whom these assumptions would be of benefit. Results of the application of problematization methodology and integral framework have problematized the three current assumptions, i.e.“experienced meaningfulness”, “outside-in” view of team processes, and the impact of “structure on behavior” of team members. Alternative assumptions of “felt meaningfulness”, inside-out’ view of team processes, and the impact of “culture of leadership on behavior” of team members have resulted in relevant research propositions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed along with theoretical and managerial implications.
AB - This paper examines current assumptions underlying the team effectiveness literature so as to propose alternative assumptions. Problematization methodology was used to problematize the existing assumptions. Integral Framework was applied to categorize constructs of team effectiveness literature. Alternative assumptions were proposed along with a discussion on their theory generation potential and the potential audience to whom these assumptions would be of benefit. Results of the application of problematization methodology and integral framework have problematized the three current assumptions, i.e.“experienced meaningfulness”, “outside-in” view of team processes, and the impact of “structure on behavior” of team members. Alternative assumptions of “felt meaningfulness”, inside-out’ view of team processes, and the impact of “culture of leadership on behavior” of team members have resulted in relevant research propositions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed along with theoretical and managerial implications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073029090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073029090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23322039.2019.1658418
DO - 10.1080/23322039.2019.1658418
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073029090
SN - 2332-2039
VL - 7
JO - Cogent Economics and Finance
JF - Cogent Economics and Finance
IS - 1
M1 - 1658418
ER -