TY - JOUR
T1 - Ursodeoxycholic acid for preventing parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in neonates
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Anne, Rajendra Prasad
AU - Kadyada, Srikanth Puttaiah
AU - Aradhya, Abhishek Somasekhara
AU - Oleti, Tejo Pratap
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: While ursodeoxycholic acid is used in treating parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) in neonates, its role in prevention is unclear. Objectives: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we attempted to determine the role of ursodeoxycholic acid in preventing PNAC in neonates. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched on September 16, 2023, for interventional studies comparing ursodeoxycholic acid with placebo. Results: Of the 6180 unique records identified, five studies were eligible for inclusion (three randomised and two nonrandomised). Evidence from randomised trials showed that ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis did not reduce cholestasis, mortality, sepsis, and necrotising enterocolitis. Ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis reduced feed intolerance (RR 0.23 (0.09, 0.64); 1 RCT, 102 neonates), peak conjugated bilirubin levels (MD −0.13 (−0.22, −0.04) mg/dL; 1 RCT, 102 neonates), and time to full enteral feeds (MD −2.7 (−5.09, −0.31) days; 2 RCTs, 76 neonates). There was no decrease in hospital stay and parenteral nutrition duration. Data from nonrandomised studies did not show benefit in any of the outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low. Conclusion: Because of the very low-quality evidence and lack of evidence on critical outcomes, definitive conclusions could not be made on using ursodeoxycholic acid to prevent parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in neonates.
AB - Background: While ursodeoxycholic acid is used in treating parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) in neonates, its role in prevention is unclear. Objectives: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we attempted to determine the role of ursodeoxycholic acid in preventing PNAC in neonates. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched on September 16, 2023, for interventional studies comparing ursodeoxycholic acid with placebo. Results: Of the 6180 unique records identified, five studies were eligible for inclusion (three randomised and two nonrandomised). Evidence from randomised trials showed that ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis did not reduce cholestasis, mortality, sepsis, and necrotising enterocolitis. Ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis reduced feed intolerance (RR 0.23 (0.09, 0.64); 1 RCT, 102 neonates), peak conjugated bilirubin levels (MD −0.13 (−0.22, −0.04) mg/dL; 1 RCT, 102 neonates), and time to full enteral feeds (MD −2.7 (−5.09, −0.31) days; 2 RCTs, 76 neonates). There was no decrease in hospital stay and parenteral nutrition duration. Data from nonrandomised studies did not show benefit in any of the outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low. Conclusion: Because of the very low-quality evidence and lack of evidence on critical outcomes, definitive conclusions could not be made on using ursodeoxycholic acid to prevent parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in neonates.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184927589
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184927589#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1111/fcp.12993
DO - 10.1111/fcp.12993
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38342497
AN - SCOPUS:85184927589
SN - 0767-3981
VL - 38
SP - 685
EP - 694
JO - Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology
JF - Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology
IS - 4
ER -