TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of Two Point of Care Devices for Hemoglobin Estimation in Blood Donors
AU - Chenna, Deepika
AU - Shastry, Shamee
AU - Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/3/3
Y1 - 2020/3/3
N2 - Hemoglobin (Hb) estimation is a critical investigation in prospective blood donors. There are numerous techniques for Hb estimation, choosing an appropriate method is essential. Point of care devices (POC) have made quantification of Hb possible even in the field or community settings. Validation against a standard measure is necessary before implementing it for routine practice. With this background, we aimed to validate two new POC devices against a standard hematology analyzer for Hb estimation. An observational study on 100 donor venous blood samples was conducted. Hemoglobin was estimated using a Sysmex Hematology Analyzer (reference method) along with POC devices (CompoLab TM and True Hb Hemometer). Three statistical techniques were applied to validate Hb by the two POC devices. CompoLab TM measures 0.4 units more than the reference method and True Hb measures 0.4 units less than the reference method. Measures of Hb obtained from both the equipment showed moderate agreement with that of reference method (CompoLab TM ICC-0.74 and True Hb ICC-0.72). There were no systematic or proportional differences in the comparison of the two POC devices with the reference method. Within the limitations of this study, both the devices can be used for Hb estimation, as there was a substantial agreement of the measurements with the reference method. Other factors such as cost, turnaround time (TAT), ease of utilization should be considered to decide on the choice of equipment to be used.
AB - Hemoglobin (Hb) estimation is a critical investigation in prospective blood donors. There are numerous techniques for Hb estimation, choosing an appropriate method is essential. Point of care devices (POC) have made quantification of Hb possible even in the field or community settings. Validation against a standard measure is necessary before implementing it for routine practice. With this background, we aimed to validate two new POC devices against a standard hematology analyzer for Hb estimation. An observational study on 100 donor venous blood samples was conducted. Hemoglobin was estimated using a Sysmex Hematology Analyzer (reference method) along with POC devices (CompoLab TM and True Hb Hemometer). Three statistical techniques were applied to validate Hb by the two POC devices. CompoLab TM measures 0.4 units more than the reference method and True Hb measures 0.4 units less than the reference method. Measures of Hb obtained from both the equipment showed moderate agreement with that of reference method (CompoLab TM ICC-0.74 and True Hb ICC-0.72). There were no systematic or proportional differences in the comparison of the two POC devices with the reference method. Within the limitations of this study, both the devices can be used for Hb estimation, as there was a substantial agreement of the measurements with the reference method. Other factors such as cost, turnaround time (TAT), ease of utilization should be considered to decide on the choice of equipment to be used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084077469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084077469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03630269.2020.1751652
DO - 10.1080/03630269.2020.1751652
M3 - Article
C2 - 32308056
AN - SCOPUS:85084077469
SN - 0363-0269
VL - 44
SP - 118
EP - 121
JO - Hemoglobin
JF - Hemoglobin
IS - 2
ER -