TY - JOUR
T1 - Vickers micro-hardness variation during change in concentration of constituent elements in Ni50- x Fex Mn30Sn20- y Iny,Heusler alloys
AU - S., Sandeep Nambiar
AU - B.r.n., Murthy
AU - S., Sathyashankara
AU - A.a., Prasanna
AU - J., Arout Chelvane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© S.N. S. et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2022.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Present work is on Heusler alloys of the sequence Ni50-xFexMn30Sn20-yIny, were prepared in order to investigate the relationship between microstructure and mechanical property. The work represents the variations in the hardness of the alloy when the component elements are changed. Alloys show Vickers hardness HV = 3.5 GPa at x = 2 and y = 4. At x = 4 and y = 8, alloy exhibits an L10 tetragonal structure, whereas at x = 3 and y = 6 L21 austenite phase structure is observed. Interface piling up occurs which greatly reduces fracture propagation and dislocation at neighboring interfaces. Large piled-up interfaces available in the martensite phase due to the sub-strips significantly contribute this process resulting in large hardness value. In spite of thicker laminates in the austenite phase, the alloy exhibits higher hardness than martensite phase or even the composite. Hardness is particularly low in the martensitic phase (x = 4, y = 8), which is produced owing to interfacial motion. The hardness value falls as the Sn concentration increases due to weak pinning between the strips. A drastic increase in hardness of 3.5 GPa has been observed when x = 2 and y = 4.
AB - Present work is on Heusler alloys of the sequence Ni50-xFexMn30Sn20-yIny, were prepared in order to investigate the relationship between microstructure and mechanical property. The work represents the variations in the hardness of the alloy when the component elements are changed. Alloys show Vickers hardness HV = 3.5 GPa at x = 2 and y = 4. At x = 4 and y = 8, alloy exhibits an L10 tetragonal structure, whereas at x = 3 and y = 6 L21 austenite phase structure is observed. Interface piling up occurs which greatly reduces fracture propagation and dislocation at neighboring interfaces. Large piled-up interfaces available in the martensite phase due to the sub-strips significantly contribute this process resulting in large hardness value. In spite of thicker laminates in the austenite phase, the alloy exhibits higher hardness than martensite phase or even the composite. Hardness is particularly low in the martensitic phase (x = 4, y = 8), which is produced owing to interfacial motion. The hardness value falls as the Sn concentration increases due to weak pinning between the strips. A drastic increase in hardness of 3.5 GPa has been observed when x = 2 and y = 4.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124701535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124701535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/mfreview/2022002
DO - 10.1051/mfreview/2022002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124701535
SN - 2265-4224
VL - 9
JO - Manufacturing Review
JF - Manufacturing Review
M1 - 4
ER -