TY - JOUR
T1 - Voice disorder recognition using machine learning
T2 - a scoping review protocol
AU - Gupta, Rijul
AU - Gunjawate, Dhanshree R.
AU - Nguyen, Duy Duong
AU - Jin, Craig
AU - Madill, Catherine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Author(s) (or their employer(s)).
PY - 2024/2/24
Y1 - 2024/2/24
N2 - Introduction Over the past decade, several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been investigated to assess their efficacy in detecting voice disorders. Literature indicates that ML algorithms can detect voice disorders with high accuracy. This suggests that ML has the potential to assist clinicians in the analysis and treatment outcome evaluation of voice disorders. However, despite numerous research studies, none of the algorithms have been sufficiently reliable to be used in clinical settings. Through this review, we aim to identify critical issues that have inhibited the use of ML algorithms in clinical settings by identifying standard audio tasks, acoustic features, processing algorithms and environmental factors that affect the efficacy of those algorithms. Methods We will search the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Compendex, CINAHL, Medline, IEEE Explore and Embase. Our search strategy has been developed with the assistance of the university library staff to accommodate the different syntactical requirements. The literature search will include the period between 2013 and 2023, and will be confined to articles published in English. We will exclude editorials, ongoing studies and working papers. The selection, extraction and analysis of the search data will be conducted using the 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews' system. The same system will also be used for the synthesis of the results. Ethics and dissemination This scoping review does not require ethics approval as the review solely consists of peer-reviewed publications. The findings will be presented in peer-reviewed publications related to voice pathology.
AB - Introduction Over the past decade, several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been investigated to assess their efficacy in detecting voice disorders. Literature indicates that ML algorithms can detect voice disorders with high accuracy. This suggests that ML has the potential to assist clinicians in the analysis and treatment outcome evaluation of voice disorders. However, despite numerous research studies, none of the algorithms have been sufficiently reliable to be used in clinical settings. Through this review, we aim to identify critical issues that have inhibited the use of ML algorithms in clinical settings by identifying standard audio tasks, acoustic features, processing algorithms and environmental factors that affect the efficacy of those algorithms. Methods We will search the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Compendex, CINAHL, Medline, IEEE Explore and Embase. Our search strategy has been developed with the assistance of the university library staff to accommodate the different syntactical requirements. The literature search will include the period between 2013 and 2023, and will be confined to articles published in English. We will exclude editorials, ongoing studies and working papers. The selection, extraction and analysis of the search data will be conducted using the 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews' system. The same system will also be used for the synthesis of the results. Ethics and dissemination This scoping review does not require ethics approval as the review solely consists of peer-reviewed publications. The findings will be presented in peer-reviewed publications related to voice pathology.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85186103897
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186103897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076998
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076998
M3 - Article
C2 - 38401896
AN - SCOPUS:85186103897
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 14
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 2
M1 - e076998
ER -